FROM THE EDITOR

There are very few guarantees in life, and even fewer in the facilities industry. But try this one on for size: A design team guaranteeing, and staking a portion of their fee on, a particular energy performance after the first year a new building is open.

SPONSORS

Critical Facilities Summit

More Mission Critical Training for Less Money

Conference Sessions
Learn More

If you’re a facility manager, you’d think such a guarantee should be the rule rather than the exception. It only makes sense that if a designer promises a level of performance, and a building winds up using much more energy than that promised level, the designers should be held accountable.

Designers see things quite differently. Why should they be responsible for how a building is operated after they design it to be high-performance, and commission it? If it doesn’t perform, it must be either the occupants’ fault, or the FM’s, right?

This is, of course, a vast oversimplification – but the basic question remains: How does the industry bridge the gap between a building designed to be high-performance and a building operated as efficiently as they were designed? It’s the $64,000 question in new construction these days.  

One answer comes via a contract structure worked out between the General Services Administration (GSA) and a designer for a new Army Corps of Engineers headquarters building in Seattle. The designer and contractor each staked 0.5 percent of their contract that the building would hit a particular performance target after its first year in operation. And it did! It worked!

You can read more about this building and the details of its unique contracting structure in the June issue of Building Operating Management magazine. Needless to say, there are a few caveats.

Even so, all involved with the project say they strongly believe that this type of contracting structure is an idea whose time has come. Both the designer and the owner say they think this isn’t just a “showcase” project – that this type of agreement can be repeatable and can work throughout the industry. Here’s hoping!

Cheers,

Greg Zimmerman, editor  

 

HIGH-PERFORMANCE STRATEGIES

High-Performance, Guaranteed

The designers and contractors for the Federal Center South Building 1202 in Seattle, a stunningly elegant new headquarters for the Army Corps of Engineers, staked 0.5 percent of their fee on the building hitting performance targets after the first year of operation.

 

IN THE NEWS

GSA’s Federal Center South Reduces Energy by 40 Percent in First Year

A unique contracting structure required the designer to guarantee first-year performance.

 

HIGH-PERFORMANCE MULTIMEDIA

Sustainability Improvements Require Organizational Buy-In

In this short video, Carlos Santamaria, vice president, engineering services for Glenborough, LLC, explains why nothing gets done unilaterally in an organization, especially when it comes to sustainability.